Saturday, November 22, 2003
Strange-Looking Man Fascinated With His Own 'Thoughts' Like An Infant With Its Baubles
Dear Mr. Brooks,
When words and images parade across your mind's eye, and you find that feelings have attached themselves to those words and images, it doesn't necessarily mean they are "thoughts" worthy of print. For instance, your New York Times column "The Power of Marriage," while it does contain words strung together into sentences that could be said to have "meaning," doesn't actually contain a single sincere "thought."
Mr. Brooks, I truly don't think you "think" anything. I don't think you "believe" anything. I think you are a well-paid man of unexceptional intelligence masquerading as a contrarian "moderate" "conservative" with something to say. But the truth is you don't have anything to say. You simply write strings of words that you guess will appear to readers as sentences containing interesting content. But again: there is no content; and they're not interesting.
Also: your face looks really weird. You look like a "geek," in the old-fashioned sense.
Please leave the New York Times. You're not hip. You're not hip-ly square. You're not anything. You just suck.
Sincerely,
Blicero
posted by Blicero : 11/22/2003 01:56:00 AM
