More sickening shit.

In an equally denial-ridden, pitiful attempt to mitigate the previous op/ed written by a worthless representative of the Israeli "mainstream," we get the spurious craptastic bulldore of the supposedly "distanced" and "nuanced" NYTimes position. Let's look at some of the key turns of phrase:

"The Americans have decided that a freeze is needed to show Palestinians and other Arabs that Israel’s conservative government is serious about peace."

"The Americans"-- not the Americans who have written the article-- have "decided" that a freeze is needed to "show" seriousness about peace. Why might this be?

Amazingly, astonishingly, this ENTIRE OP/ED NEGLECTS TO MENTION THAT IT IS PRECISELY THE SETTLEMENTS THAT ARE THE GREATEST AND MOST EGREGIOUS INSULT TO THE REST OF THE REGION-- not only an obstacle to peace, but as nefarious and destructive policy against peace as can be found.

"Less visibly, but we hope just as assertively, the administration is pressing the Palestinians and other Arab leaders to take concrete steps to demonstrate their commitment to a peace deal."

What sorts of steps? WHY DOES THE NEW YORK TIMES INSIST ON PRETENDING THAT BOTH SIDES ARE EQUAL? CAN THIS CHARADE BE CARRIED ANY FURTHER? WHY IS THE NYTIMES A BUNCH OF SHIT-SUCKING FUCKING ASSHOLES???????

"President Obama, a skilled communicator, has started a constructive dialogue with the Islamic world. Now he needs to explain to Israelis why freezing settlements and reviving peace talks is clearly in their interest."

Yes! Of course! All the shell-shocked war-brainwashed Israeli populace needs is for the freezing of settlements to be PROPERLY EXPLAINED, and then everything will be well!! Jesus Christ Obama, get off your ass and get on it! Less Bud Lite and more explaining!